بررسی حساسیت گیاهان مختلف نسبت به جدایه‌های Rhizoctonia solani در استان کرمان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد گروه گیاهپزشکی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه ولی عصر (عج) رفسنجان، رفسنجان، ایران

2 استادیار گروه گیاهپزشکی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه ولی عصر (عج) رفسنجان، رفسنجان، ایران

3 استادیار موسسه تحقیقات اصلاح و تهیه بذر چغندرقند، کرج، ایران

چکیده

در این پژوهش حساسیت گیاهان زراعی مختلف نسبت به جدایه‌های ریزوکتونیا به منظور به کارگیری در یک تناوب موفق در استان کرمان مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. شدت آلودگی به بیمارگر با استفاده از مقیاس نمره‌دهی 0 تا 5 در شرایط درون شیشه ای و 1 تا 9 در شرایط گلخانه مبنای مقایسه حساسیت میزبان‌ها قرار گرفت. نتایج شدت آلودگی میزبان‌‌ها نشان داد که ذرت و گندم به ترتیب با 66/1 و 58/0 در شرایط آزمایشگاه و 46/1 و63/2 در شرایط گلخانه دارای کمترین میزان حساسیت بودند. چغندرقند و گلرنگ با متوسط شدت آلودگی 52/3 و 40/3 در آزمایشگاه و گوجه فرنگی و خربزه با متوسط شدت آلودگی 22 /7 و 37/6 در شرایط گلخانه بیشترین حساسیت را به گروه‌های آناستوموزی دو، سه و چهار  نشان دادند. نتایج این مطالعه نشان داد که گروه آناستوموزی چهار دارای بالاترین شاخص آلودگی و گروه آناستوموزی سه دارای کمترین میزان در هر دو شرایط درون شیشه ای و گلخانه بود. شاخص آلودگی در بین جدایه‌های با گروه آناستوموزی یکسان و همچنین بین جدایه‌های باگروه آناستوموزی مختلف متفاوت بود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigation on sensitivity of different crops to Rhizoctonia solani in Kerman province

نویسندگان [English]

  • S. Molaei, 1
  • H. Alaei, 2
  • S.B. Mahmoudi, 3
چکیده [English]

In this study, sensitivity of different field crops to isolates of Rhizoctonia solani was studied in order to apply more successful crop rotation program in Kerman Province. Disease severity indices (DSI) were measured by grading scales of 0-5 in vitro and 1-9 in vivo conditions which were regarded as the basis of host susceptibility. The results of disease severity evaluations showed that maize and wheat with DSI of 1.66 and 0.58 in laboratory condition and 1.46 and 2.63 in greenhouse had the minimum sensitivities respectively. Sugar beet and safflower with severity indices 3/52 and 3/40 in laboratory condition and tomato and melon with 7/22 and 6/37 in greenhouse conditions were the most susceptible species to anastomosis groups 2, 3 and 4. Our results show that anastomosis group 4 had the highest while anastomosis group 3 had the lowest disease severity indices under the two conditions of laboratory and greenhouse. Disease severity indices were different among isolates belonging to same anastomosis groups, and within different anastomosis groups.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Rhizoctonia solani
  • Pathogenicity
  • Disease index
  • Crop Rotation

مراجع

  1. Anderson NA. 1982. The genetics and pathology of Rhizoctonia solani. Annal Review of Phytopathology 20: 329–347.
  2. Belmar SB, Jones RK and Starr JL. 1987. Influnce of crop rotation in inoculum density of Rhizoctonia solani and sheath blight incidence in rice. Phytopathology 77: 1138–1143.
  3. Bolkan HA. 1980. Root rot. In: Bean production problems: Disease insect, soil and incitant of banded sclerotial disease of maize. Indian Phytopathology 34: 494–496.
  4. Burcky K, Buttner G and Winner C. 1986. Schadigung der ZuckerrUbe durch das Aderngelbfleckigkeits-virus (BNYVV) in AbhSngigkeit vom Verseuchungsgrad des Bodens. 1. Gewicht, Riibenqualita't und Virustiter. Zuckerindustrie 111: 216–224.
  5. Buttner G and Mangold B. 1997. Jungpflanzen test zur Quantifizierung von BNYVV-Resistenz bei Zuckerru¨ bensorten: Grundlagen, Verfahren und Ergebnisse. Vortr Pflanzenzuchtg 37: 103–112.
  6. Carling DE and Sumner DR. 1992. Rhizoctonia. pp 157–165, In LL Singleton, JD Mihail and CM Rush (eds) Methods for Research on soilborne Phytopathogenic Fungi. St. Paul, MN, USA: American Phytopathology Society Press.
  7. Chand T and Logan C. 1983. Cultural and pathogenic variation in potato isolates of Rhizoctoniasolani in Northern Ireland. Transactions of British Mycological Society 81:585–589.
  8. Chet I and Baker R. 1980. Induction of supperssivenes to Rhizoctonia solani in soil. Phytopathology 70: 994–998.
  9. Fiddaman PJ and Rossall S. 1995. Selection of bacterial antagonists for the biological control of Rhizoctonia solani in oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Plant Pathology 44: 695–703
  10. Henis Y, Ghaffar A and Baker R. 1978. Integrated control of Rhizoctonia solani damping-off of radish: effect of suppressive planting, PNCB, and Trichoderma harzianum on pathogen and disease. Phytopathology 68: 900–907.
  11. Karaca GH, Ozkoc I and Erper I. 2002. Determination the anastomosis grouping and virulence of Rhizoctonia solani isolates associated with bean plants grow in Samsun/Turkey. Pakistan Journal of Biological Science 5: 434–437.
  12. Kataria HR and Verma PR. 1990. Efficacy of fungicidal seed treatments against pre-emergence damping-off and post-emergence seedling root rot of growth chamber grown canola caused by Rhizoctonia solani AG 2-1 and AG 4. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 12: 409–416.
  13. Kataria HR, Verma PR and Gisi U. 1991. Variability in the sensitivity of Rhizoctonia solani anastomosis group to fungicides. Phytopathology 133: 121–133.
  14. Keijer J, Korsman MG, Dullemans AM and Houterman PM .1997. In vitro analysis of host plant specificity in Rhizoctonia solani. Plant Pathology 46: 659–669.
  15. Kuninaga S. Carling DE, Takeuchi T and Yokosawa R. 2000. Comparison of rDNA-ITS sequences between potato and tobacco strains in Rhizoctonia solani AG-3. Journal of General Plant Pathology 66: 2–11.
  16. Leach SS and Clapham WM. 1992. Rhizoctonia solani on white lupine. Plant Disease 76: 417–419.
  17. Lee FN and Rush MC. 1983. Rice sheath blight: A major rice disease. Plant Disease 67: 829–832.
  18. MacNish GC. 1985. Method of reducing Rhizoctonia patch of cereal in Western Australia. Plant Pathology 34: 175–181.
  19. Mahmoudi B, Mesbah M and Alizadeh AA. 2004. Diversity pathogenicity isolates Rhizoctonia solani from sugar beet. Iranian Journal of Plant Pathology 40: 253–280.
  20. Mazzola M, Smiley RW, Rovira AD and Cook RJ. 1996. Characterization of Rhizoctonia isolates, diseases occurrence and management in cereals. pp. 259–267, In B Sneh, S Jabaji-Hare, S Neate and G Dijst (eds) Rhizoctonia Species: Taxonomy, Molecular Biology, Ecology, Pathology and Disease Control. Kluwer: Academic Publishers.
  21. Mordue JEM. 1974. Rhizoctonia oryzae-sativae CMI. No. 409.
  22. Mordue JE, Curran RS and Bridge PD. 1989. An integrated approach to Rhizoctonia taxonomy: cultural, biochemical and numerical techniques. Mycological Research 92: 78–910.
  23. Ogoshi A.1987. Ecology and pathogenic of anastomosis and intraspecific groups of Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn. Annual Review of Phytopathlogy 25: 125–143.
  24. Parameter JR.1970.Rhizoctonia solani, Biology and Pathology. Berkeley, CA, USA: University of California Press.
  25. Premalatha Dath A. 1990. Sheath Blight Disease of Rice and its Management. New Delhi, India: Associate Publishing Company. 129 p.
  26. Robinson H and Deacon JW. 2002. Double-standard RNA elements in Rhizoctonia solani AG-3. Mycological Research 106: 12–22.
  27. Roget DK, Neat SM and Rovira AD. 1996. Effect of sowing point design and tillage practice on incidence of Rhizoctonia root rot, Take-all and cereal cyst nematode in wheat and barley. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 36: 683–693.
  28. Roget DK. 1995. Decline in root rot Rhizoctonia solani (AG-8) in wheat in tillage and rotation experiment at Avon, South Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 35: 1009–1013.
  29. Rovira AD. 1986. Influence of crop rotation and tillage on Rhizoctonia bare patch of wheat. Phytopathology 76: 669–673.
  30. Safaee N, Minassian V, Rahimian H and Banihashemi Z. 1999. Isolation, identification and pathogenicity of Rhizoctonia fungi isolated from several host plants in the Khuzestan Province. Iranian Journal of Plant Pathology 35: 1–8.
  31. Saffarian Abbas Zadeh M, Farokh Nejad R and Mahmoudi B. 2007. Pathogenic diversity among the isolates of Rhizoctonia solani recovered from potato tubers and sugar beet. Agricultural Research 7: 211–228.
  32. Shew HD and Melton TA. 1995. Target spot of tobacco in North Carolina. Plant Disease 69: 901–903.
  33. Shipton, PJ. 1977. Monoculture and soilborne plant pathogens. Annal Review of Phytopathology 15: 387–407.
  34. Sneh B, Burpee L and Ogoshi A. 1991. Identification of Rhizoctonia Species. St, Paul, MN, USA: American Phytopathological Society Press.
  35. Specht LP and Leach SS. 1987. Effect crop rotation on Rhizoctonia disease of white potato. Plant Disease 71: 433–437.
  36. Steven-Johnk J, Jones RK, Shew HD and Carling DE. 1993. Characterization of population of Rhizoctonia solni AG-3 from potato and tobacco. Phytopathology 83: 854–858.
  37. Vilgalys R and Cubeta MA. 1994. Molecular systematics and population biology of Rhizoctonia. Annual Review of Phytopathology 32: 135–155
  38. Wessles PGW. 2001. Soil nitrogen dynamics and spring wheat (T. aestivum) production in different cropping system in the swartland [MSc thesis]. [Stellenbosch]: University of Stellenbosch.
  39. Yang J and Verma PR. 1992. Screening genotype for resistance to Pre-emergence damping-off and Post-emergence seedling root rot of oilseed rape and canola caused by Rhizoctonia solani AG2-1. Crop Protection 11: 443–448
  40. Yang J, Kharbanda, PD and McAndrew DW. 1995. Anastomosis groups and Pathogenicity of Rhizoctonia sp. from canola and barley rotation under reduced tillage in Alberta. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 17: 364 (Abstract).

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار